TalkTopics.com - Talk about everything on earth!

Go Back   TalkTopics.com > TalkTopics Community > Automotive > Navigation & GPS

Navigation & GPS Road maps are things of the past.
Live in the new age and navigate your way with high-tech navigation and GPS Systems.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2007, 02:58 AM
hassen1 hassen1 is offline
Senior Member
Professor
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Colombo, Sri Lanka
Posts: 3,209
hassen1 is on a distinguished road
Send a message via MSN to hassen1 Send a message via Yahoo to hassen1
What accuracy can i expect?

The Standard Positioning Service (SPS) available to civilian users
should give 20 metre horizontal accuracy, however it is normally
degraded to 100 metres (95% of the time) due to Selective
Availability (SA). (That is, the reported position will be within
100 metres of the true position 95% of the time.) The vertical
accuracy is about 1.5 times worse than horizontal, due to
satellite geometry. (Satellites are more likely to be near the
horizon, than directly overhead.)

Trimble Navigation, in their booklet "GPS - A guide to the next
utility" give the following error budget for commercial navigation
receivers:
Satellite clock error 2 ft.
Ephemeris error 2 ft.
Receiver errors 4 ft.
Atmospheric/ionospheric 12 ft.
Selective Availability 25 ft.
Total (root-sum-square) 15 - 30 ft depending on SA
The predicted acuracy is calculated by multiplying the above
figure by the PDOP (Position Dilution of Precision) which
typically will range from 4 to 6. This gives accuracies of 60 -
100 ft (30 m) without SA, up to 350 ft (100 m) with SA.

The accuracy can be improved by averaging readings over some time.
When taking readings for this purpose, there is apparently no
point in taking the readings more often than every 15 min, or so.

One user reports the following results:
Averaging for 15 - 20 hours: 10 metre accuracy
24 hours 5 metres
48 hours 3 metres

The error values are given as "2*sigma" values - for those (like
myself) who don't do statistics, this means that the readings
should be distributed as follows (for a 2*sigma of 100 metres):
32% of values are worse than sigma (50 metres)
5% of values are worse than 2*sigma (100 metres)
1% of values are worse than 2.6*sigma (130 metres)
0.3% of values are worse than 3*sigma (150 metres)
0.006% of values are worse than 4*sigma (200 metres)
0.00006% of values are worse than 5*sigma (250 metres)
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-15-2007, 04:14 AM
pussykitty pussykitty is offline
Member
Friendizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 91
pussykitty is on a distinguished road
huh? does that mean that we should not take readings so frequently???
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What to expect in artificial insemination hassen1 Fertility Discussions 0 01-01-2007 03:34 AM
What tests should i expect? hassen1 Fertility Discussions 0 12-29-2006 01:50 AM
What should i expect from a good doctor who is willing to he hassen1 Fertility Discussions 0 12-29-2006 01:49 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:59 AM.





Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.0.0 RC6