Terrorism: the new world evil...

summie · #1 (**permalink**) 04-08-2006, 10:15 PM

Whoelse believes that the current terrorism problem we have in the world has the potential to lead to a nuclear holocaust?

capricorn9946 · #2 (**permalink**) 04-20-2006, 10:29 AM

terrorism cannot bring us to the verge of nuclear holocast because of 2 reasons:
terrorism is led by some group of fanatics..they can achieve short term goals by spreading terror but they cannot start world war 3 or any sort of nuclear holocast as they dosn't represent any separate country and no country can openly support terrorism.
they does not have well formed disciplined group like the professional soldiers in the field so meeting long term mission protocols are out of question. there existence is based on some money and local support so when both these thinks are taken out ...they are practically paralyzed.

humpty · #3 (**permalink**) 06-07-2006, 09:28 AM

That sounds pretty logic, but what about the short term,
as in now, the now, terrorism is still an active thing and anything bad can happen without warning, and that alone caused so much damage to anyone or any country choosed as the victim.

Ain't that sad, I wonder how the military forces are handling terrorism right now, is everything over yet?

By the way, would you know where to find more info on terrorism?

tush88 · #4 (**permalink**) 06-13-2006, 04:30 PM

Yea i do agree..n itz true coz nw da thingz hv really heated up..nobody wud take this terrorism shit..n yes goin by da reuters some countries r supportin it..

ucancomenshare · #5 (**permalink**) 06-24-2006, 06:24 PM

yea they think that they r doing it all 4 a "good cause" what the ...hell killing ppl 4 a good cause haa that was new 2 me .....in india its like in full swing n i really pity other countries also

sanuanu · #6 (**permalink**) 06-26-2006, 07:28 AM

Well, they say that they are doing if for goood cause but these are all said to provoke younger generation to become part of them and thus can make more money through terrorism. Yes, money and power are main reason against it and its a world wide problem. every countriy is effected form it.

Quote:

terrorism is led by some group of fanatics..they can achieve short term goals by spreading terror but they cannot start world war 3 or any sort of nuclear holocast as they dosn't represent any separate country and no country can openly support terrorism.

Very true. Terrorism can only make small changes, they can't start a revelution as these are not their prime targets.

blazingcow · #7 (**permalink**) 06-27-2006, 02:35 PM

Terrorism as become the first worry of politicians all over the world. Full scale terorism, that is. It is true that they are all separate groups striking locally and punctually. But since september 11, things have become much different on the world's politics, they striked the untouchable. They have striked in Spain, UK ever since and there appears much more dangerous than you say.

Quote:

terrorism is led by some group of fanatics..they can achieve short term goals by spreading terror but they cannot start world war 3 or any sort of nuclear holocast as they dosn't represent any separate country and no country can openly support terrorism.

No country can openly support terrorism... that's right somehow, eventhough some countries say can be pretty slow or unwilling to stop it (aka palestinia) or help them when terrorism could serve their own cause (wester coutries had many times helped terrorism to create civil wars). What is going on in my opinion pretty much looks like a world war because everyone is concerned by terrorism, yet it is a much more underground-ish and strategic kind of war. Strings are being pulled all over the world and negociation are being made. And this is not close to stop eventhough things seem much quieter these days.

ucancomenshare · #8 (**permalink**) 06-27-2006, 03:19 PM

any country who is going 2 support than legally is seriously gonna b in big trouble so no1 really even dares 2 do that

richiekotzenrules · #9 (**permalink**) 06-27-2006, 06:40 PM

Terrorism is not new. Terrorism is thown around by one group that another group disagrees with. If I were an Iraqi I'd consider George Bush and the USA terrorist. They come into Iraq invade them which happens to be against UN laws. Not to mention the fact that they occupy Iraq and Afganistan. Isreal calls Palistian terroist. Are they really or do they just want their country back. Palistine was taken away by the USA and the Jews at the end of WW2 encase you may not know that. The Palistinians did nothing to the Jews.

If we go back futher before 1776 is America. There were a group of British colonials called the minute men who secretly attacked the British and those loyal to the British. Were the minute men terrorist?

If the middle east didn't have oil then thousands of innocent people wouldn't have had to die because of the USA. If a country has lots of oil they better watch out or the USA will find a reason to attack it. I can't wait till the world gets sick of USA's actions and destroys them. I can understand Iran's desire to have nuclear weapons and I think they should have them if their enemies have them as well.

alma1216 · #10 (**permalink**) 08-01-2006, 09:20 PM

Terroism has been bringing people worried especially the president and his people.Ever since 9/11 everyone is worried that something can happen anywhere in the untied states.All the government is doing is watching out for any terroism attacks.It's really sad to see each other worried because of this

peachey · #11 (**permalink**) 08-12-2006, 02:19 AM

rich wrote:

Quote:

If the middle east didn't have oil then thousands of innocent people wouldn't have had to die because of the USA. If a country has lots of oil they better watch out or the USA will find a reason to attack it. I can't wait till the world gets sick of USA's actions and destroys them. I can understand Iran's desire to have nuclear weapons and I think they should have them if their enemies have them as well.

Really sorry you feel this way.....just remember that this is the goverment that isdoing this and not the people of the US...majority of the people do not agree with what Bush has done or what is doing ....

freakyfreddie · #12 (**permalink**) 09-22-2006, 10:16 AM

yeah but they are the ones who voted for him in the first place,
can't they choose someone better, by choosing him, they made him leader, and that has made a lot of mess for the world

peachey · #13 (**permalink**) 09-24-2006, 03:00 PM

Not sure where you are from but in this country when you vote it goes by electorial votes. Each state as a number of electorial votes. How the people in that state votes is where the electorial votes go. So the larger the state the more electorial votes..If the vote is with in hundreds it still goes to the one that has he most votes in that state..

I personally think the voting here is not right but then I am one person.
I have to agree with you, but then some of the other ones that were running were worse. So had to I guess get the best.

Hopefully soon things will change and he will not be able to run again for this office..Just hope who ever is next will be able to clean up and move on.

janetgan · #14 (**permalink**) 10-17-2006, 08:18 AM

Quote:

Hopefully soon things will change and he will not be able to run again for this office..Just hope who ever is next will be able to clean up and move on

I agree with you peachey
let's pray hard for that to happen

peachey · #15 (**permalink**) 10-17-2006, 02:10 PM

Yep you are right Jane...and where are you from the US ..thanks for your support