amd vs intel

[poonamhcp]

it's a war going between amd or intel. but i have full faith in amd as it provides full features of intel microprocessors and are economical too. i have an msi motherboard with amd processor and assembled one with tft which costed me around 35000/-

[noodlebunny]

It cost you $35,000? I hope that's a joke because I could build a similar PC for well under $1,000.

[arpan911]

well noodlebunny, poonam was indication 35000/- in the form of indian rupees which is about $800,

well ya, i been using intel for the last 7 years and amd for the last 5, well both haves lots of pros and cons , but if you ask me i will choise amd over intel any day. :D

[noodlebunny]

I am using an AMD x2 4200+ right now and it is so fast. I would recommend AMD over Intel any day right now but just recently, Intel introduced their dual core processors so I don't know, we'll have to see. AMD still looks faster and they are introducing their quad core processors very soon!

[mini_0]

Chip-makers AMD and Intel have released dual core processors aimed at users who need high arithmetic performance and use mainly multithreaded applications. Programs such as CAD/CAM and audio or video processing benefit particularly from a second processor core. However, AMD and Intel's dual core chips for this market cost between $500 and $1,000, and are therefore much too expensive for the mass market. .

[samkhan]

No doubt INTEL is the king.

AMD is there, but it is always second choice of any vender.

I am sure that you might be also using INTEL for your PC.

Then why bother for AMD.

:)

[fredilan]

in my experience, AMD warms up so fast but it is somehow faster that Intel versions.

Originally Posted by samkhan

No doubt INTEL is the king.

AMD is there, but it is always second choice of any vender.

I am sure that you might be also using INTEL for your PC.

Then why bother for AMD.

:)